Saturday, October 6, 2012

ROMNEY THE LIAR'S SICK JOKE

The amazing Paul Krugman weighs in on one of Willard's more brazen and disgusting lies from Wednesday's debate. Excerpts:

“No. 1,” declared Mitt Romney in Wednesday’s debate, “pre-existing conditions are covered under my [health care] plan.” No, they aren't — as Mr. Romney’s own advisers have conceded in the past, and did again after the debate.

Was Mr. Romney lying? Well, either that or he was making what amounts to a sick joke. Either way, his attempt to deceive voters on this issue was the biggest of many misleading and/or dishonest claims he made over the course of that hour and a half. Yes, President Obama did a notably bad job of responding. But I’ll leave the theater criticism to others and talk instead about the issue that should be at the heart of this election.


********
[After pointing out that Romney's plan has nothing to do with anyone's definition of pre-existing.] What Mr. Romney did in the debate, in other words, was, at best, to play a word game with voters, pretending to offer something substantive for the uninsured while actually offering nothing. For all practical purposes, he simply lied about what his policy proposals would do.

How many Americans would be left out in the cold under Mr. Romney’s plan? One answer is 89 million. According to the nonpartisan Commonwealth Foundation, that’s the number of Americans who lack the “continuous coverage” that would make them eligible for health insurance under Mr. Romney’s empty promises. By the way, that’s more than a third of the U.S. population under 65 years old.

Another answer is 45 million, the estimated number of people who would have health insurance if Mr. Obama were re-elected, but would lose it if Mr. Romney were to win.

Read the whole thing, and then spread the word:

ROMNEY'S DEBATE PERFORMANCE WAS NOTHING BUT A PACK OF LIES DESIGNED TO DECEIVE PEOPLE.

We cannot--we WILL NOT--allow our beloved country to fall into the hands of this greasy, lying, used car salesman Romney.

Let's step it up!

2 comments:

  1. http://factcheck.org...nergy-whoppers/

    Mitt Romney made numerous bogus claims in the Oct. 3 debate about the $90 billion in grants, guaranteed loans and tax breaks for energy projects in the stimulus bill:

    Romney falsely claimed “about half” of the clean-energy companies that received U.S.-backed loans “have gone out of business.” But 26 companies received loan guarantees under a loan program cited by Romney, and three of those have filed for bankruptcy. The three firms were approved for about 6 percent of the loan guarantees.

    Romney incorrectly claimed the “$90 billion in breaks to the green energy world” was provided “in one year.” It was two.
    He stated at one point that Obama put $90 billion “into solar and wind.” But only $21 billion went for renewable energy projects, “such as the installation of wind turbines and solar panels,” according to a White House document cited by the Romney campaign. The spending also included $18 billion for transit projects and $10 billion to upgrade the nation’s electrical grid.

    He falsely claimed the $90 billion was equal to “about 50 years’ worth of what oil and gas receives” in tax breaks, which he estimated at $2.8 billion. By his own figures, it would have been 32 years’ worth. But it’s even less than that. The administration estimates that eliminating oil and gas tax preferences would raise about $3.9 billion a year (23 years’ worth). The industry itself says the administration would increase its taxes by $8.5 billion a year (10.5 years’ worth).

    He falsely claimed Obama “put $90 billion into green jobs … that would have hired 2 million teachers.” But that $90 billion included loan guarantees, not just grant money, and the government can’t hire teachers with loan guarantees.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent job of nailing Willard, El!

    ReplyDelete